Tree Morphologic Plasticity Explains Deviation from Metabolic Scaling Theory in Semi-Arid Conifer Forests, Southwestern USA

Persistent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/618959
Title:
Tree Morphologic Plasticity Explains Deviation from Metabolic Scaling Theory in Semi-Arid Conifer Forests, Southwestern USA
Author:
Swetnam, Tyson L. ( 0000-0002-6639-7181 ) ; O’Connor, Christopher D.; Lynch, Ann M.
Affiliation:
Univ Arizona, Sch Nat Resources & Environm; Univ Arizona, Tree Ring Res Lab
Issue Date:
2016-07-08
Publisher:
Public Library of Science
Citation:
Tree Morphologic Plasticity Explains Deviation from Metabolic Scaling Theory in Semi-Arid Conifer Forests, Southwestern USA 2016, 11 (7):e0157582 PLOS ONE
Journal:
PLOS ONE
Rights:
This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Collection Information:
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
Abstract:
A significant concern about Metabolic Scaling Theory (MST) in real forests relates to consistent differences between the values of power law scaling exponents of tree primary size measures used to estimate mass and those predicted by MST. Here we consider why observed scaling exponents for diameter and height relationships deviate from MST predictions across three semi-arid conifer forests in relation to: (1) tree condition and physical form, (2) the level of inter-tree competition (e.g. open vs closed stand structure), (3) increasing tree age, and (4) differences in site productivity. Scaling exponent values derived from non-linear least-squares regression for trees in excellent condition (n = 381) were above the MST prediction at the 95% confidence level, while the exponent for trees in good condition were no different than MST (n = 926). Trees that were in fair or poor condition, characterized as diseased, leaning, or sparsely crowned had exponent values below MST predictions (n = 2,058), as did recently dead standing trees (n = 375). Exponent value of the mean-tree model that disregarded tree condition (n = 3,740) was consistent with other studies that reject MST scaling. Ostensibly, as stand density and competition increase trees exhibited greater morphological plasticity whereby the majority had characteristically fair or poor growth forms. Fitting by least-squares regression biases the mean-tree model scaling exponent toward values that are below MST idealized predictions. For 368 trees from Arizona with known establishment dates, increasing age had no significant impact on expected scaling. We further suggest height to diameter ratios below MST relate to vertical truncation caused by limitation in plant water availability. Even with environmentally imposed height limitation, proportionality between height and diameter scaling exponents were consistent with the predictions of MST.
Note:
Open Access Journal
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0157582
Version:
Final published version
Sponsors:
USFS Region 3 Office; Coronado National Forest; Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest Service through Research Joint Venture Agreement [07-JV-11221615-317]; University of Arizona; Nature Conservancy; Critical Zone Observatory (NSF Award) [0724958]; USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station [07-JV-11221615-317]; U.S. Forest Service; United States National Park Service, Valles Caldera National Preserve
Additional Links:
http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157582

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorSwetnam, Tyson L.en
dc.contributor.authorO’Connor, Christopher D.en
dc.contributor.authorLynch, Ann M.en
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-27T00:58:13Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-27T00:58:13Z-
dc.date.issued2016-07-08-
dc.identifier.citationTree Morphologic Plasticity Explains Deviation from Metabolic Scaling Theory in Semi-Arid Conifer Forests, Southwestern USA 2016, 11 (7):e0157582 PLOS ONEen
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0157582-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/618959-
dc.description.abstractA significant concern about Metabolic Scaling Theory (MST) in real forests relates to consistent differences between the values of power law scaling exponents of tree primary size measures used to estimate mass and those predicted by MST. Here we consider why observed scaling exponents for diameter and height relationships deviate from MST predictions across three semi-arid conifer forests in relation to: (1) tree condition and physical form, (2) the level of inter-tree competition (e.g. open vs closed stand structure), (3) increasing tree age, and (4) differences in site productivity. Scaling exponent values derived from non-linear least-squares regression for trees in excellent condition (n = 381) were above the MST prediction at the 95% confidence level, while the exponent for trees in good condition were no different than MST (n = 926). Trees that were in fair or poor condition, characterized as diseased, leaning, or sparsely crowned had exponent values below MST predictions (n = 2,058), as did recently dead standing trees (n = 375). Exponent value of the mean-tree model that disregarded tree condition (n = 3,740) was consistent with other studies that reject MST scaling. Ostensibly, as stand density and competition increase trees exhibited greater morphological plasticity whereby the majority had characteristically fair or poor growth forms. Fitting by least-squares regression biases the mean-tree model scaling exponent toward values that are below MST idealized predictions. For 368 trees from Arizona with known establishment dates, increasing age had no significant impact on expected scaling. We further suggest height to diameter ratios below MST relate to vertical truncation caused by limitation in plant water availability. Even with environmentally imposed height limitation, proportionality between height and diameter scaling exponents were consistent with the predictions of MST.en
dc.description.sponsorshipUSFS Region 3 Office; Coronado National Forest; Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest Service through Research Joint Venture Agreement [07-JV-11221615-317]; University of Arizona; Nature Conservancy; Critical Zone Observatory (NSF Award) [0724958]; USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station [07-JV-11221615-317]; U.S. Forest Service; United States National Park Service, Valles Caldera National Preserveen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157582en
dc.rightsThis is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.en
dc.titleTree Morphologic Plasticity Explains Deviation from Metabolic Scaling Theory in Semi-Arid Conifer Forests, Southwestern USAen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Sch Nat Resources & Environmen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Tree Ring Res Laben
dc.identifier.journalPLOS ONEen
dc.description.noteOpen Access Journalen
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
All Items in UA Campus Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.