SEX EDUCATION: A COMPARISON OF ARIZONAN AND DUTCH MODELS AND HEALTH OUTCOMES

Persistent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/613768
Title:
SEX EDUCATION: A COMPARISON OF ARIZONAN AND DUTCH MODELS AND HEALTH OUTCOMES
Author:
WILLIS, ALYSSA BROOKE
Issue Date:
2016
Publisher:
The University of Arizona.
Rights:
Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
Abstract:
Many young people go without the sex education that they need in order to lead healthy lives. In Arizona, schools are not required to teach sex education at all, and those that do must stress abstinence ("Arizona State Profile Fiscal Year 2014", 2014). The Netherlands, on the other hand, takes a comprehensive approach that covers emotions, human development, sexual orientation, contraceptives, and much more (de Melker, 2015). The implications of neglecting to provide comprehensive sex education include high costs, teen pregnancy rates, and STI rates. In 2004, $252 million in Arizona was used to cover the costs of teen pregnancies (“Sex Education”, 2016). The teen birth rate in Arizona was 12 times higher than in the Netherlands in 2007 (“Adolescent Fertility Rate”, 2016) and (“Teenage Pregnancy, 2003-2013”, 2016). Also, Arizona’s STI incidence rates in 2007 were 9 times higher for chlamydia, 11 times higher for gonorrhea, and 3 times higher for syphilis ("Reportable STDs in Young People 15-24 Years of Age, by State", 2016) and (“STI Display Tool”, 2016). These costs and health outcomes show that comprehensive, not abstinence-only, sex education is the model that we should implement in Arizona.
Type:
text; Electronic Thesis
Degree Name:
B.S.
Degree Level:
Bachelors
Degree Program:
Honors College; Public Health
Degree Grantor:
University of Arizona
Advisor:
Duncan, Burris

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.titleSEX EDUCATION: A COMPARISON OF ARIZONAN AND DUTCH MODELS AND HEALTH OUTCOMESen_US
dc.creatorWILLIS, ALYSSA BROOKEen
dc.contributor.authorWILLIS, ALYSSA BROOKEen
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en
dc.description.abstractMany young people go without the sex education that they need in order to lead healthy lives. In Arizona, schools are not required to teach sex education at all, and those that do must stress abstinence ("Arizona State Profile Fiscal Year 2014", 2014). The Netherlands, on the other hand, takes a comprehensive approach that covers emotions, human development, sexual orientation, contraceptives, and much more (de Melker, 2015). The implications of neglecting to provide comprehensive sex education include high costs, teen pregnancy rates, and STI rates. In 2004, $252 million in Arizona was used to cover the costs of teen pregnancies (“Sex Education”, 2016). The teen birth rate in Arizona was 12 times higher than in the Netherlands in 2007 (“Adolescent Fertility Rate”, 2016) and (“Teenage Pregnancy, 2003-2013”, 2016). Also, Arizona’s STI incidence rates in 2007 were 9 times higher for chlamydia, 11 times higher for gonorrhea, and 3 times higher for syphilis ("Reportable STDs in Young People 15-24 Years of Age, by State", 2016) and (“STI Display Tool”, 2016). These costs and health outcomes show that comprehensive, not abstinence-only, sex education is the model that we should implement in Arizona.en
dc.typetexten
dc.typeElectronic Thesisen
thesis.degree.nameB.S.en
thesis.degree.levelBachelorsen
thesis.degree.disciplineHonors Collegeen
thesis.degree.disciplinePublic Healthen
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen
dc.contributor.advisorDuncan, Burrisen
All Items in UA Campus Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.