ANALYSIS OF USER ATTITUDES REGARDING MANAGEMENT POLICY OF COLORADO RIVER FLOAT TRIPS

Persistent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/290526
Title:
ANALYSIS OF USER ATTITUDES REGARDING MANAGEMENT POLICY OF COLORADO RIVER FLOAT TRIPS
Author:
Johnson, Robert Chester, 1944-
Issue Date:
1980
Publisher:
The University of Arizona.
Rights:
Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
Abstract:
A dramatic increase in the number of individuals taking float trips on the Colorado River through Grand Canyon National Park has occurred over the last decade. The National Park Service has attempted to protect the fragile river corridor from "overuse" through implementation of the 1979 River Management Plan. A survey of users taking float trips through Marble and Grand Canyons has been conducted to measure attitudes about National Park Service management policies of the river trips. The study has been designed to categorize users along a wildernist scale and determine whether a difference in attitude concerning river management policy existed between more wilderness oriented participants and less wilderness oriented participants. Users have been categorized into three wildernist categories: Neutralists, Slight Wildernists, and Moderate Wildernists. Attitudes regarding river and canyon management policy were significantly different between wilderness categories in ten of sixteen policy questions. Also, a significant difference existed in attitudes when comparing pre- and post-trip responses. Mode of travel was associated with mean wilderness scores. Two survey instruments have been used in the study: a self-administered questionnaire and a paired-picture comparison interview. Description of the two instruments used as well as a discussion of the major findings are presented.
Type:
text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic)
Keywords:
Boats and boating -- Environmental aspects -- Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico); Water -- Pollution -- Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico); Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico) -- Recreational use -- Environmental aspects.
Degree Name:
Ph.D.
Degree Level:
doctoral
Degree Program:
Graduate College; Renewable Natural Resources
Degree Grantor:
University of Arizona

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleANALYSIS OF USER ATTITUDES REGARDING MANAGEMENT POLICY OF COLORADO RIVER FLOAT TRIPSen_US
dc.creatorJohnson, Robert Chester, 1944-en_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Robert Chester, 1944-en_US
dc.date.issued1980en_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.description.abstractA dramatic increase in the number of individuals taking float trips on the Colorado River through Grand Canyon National Park has occurred over the last decade. The National Park Service has attempted to protect the fragile river corridor from "overuse" through implementation of the 1979 River Management Plan. A survey of users taking float trips through Marble and Grand Canyons has been conducted to measure attitudes about National Park Service management policies of the river trips. The study has been designed to categorize users along a wildernist scale and determine whether a difference in attitude concerning river management policy existed between more wilderness oriented participants and less wilderness oriented participants. Users have been categorized into three wildernist categories: Neutralists, Slight Wildernists, and Moderate Wildernists. Attitudes regarding river and canyon management policy were significantly different between wilderness categories in ten of sixteen policy questions. Also, a significant difference existed in attitudes when comparing pre- and post-trip responses. Mode of travel was associated with mean wilderness scores. Two survey instruments have been used in the study: a self-administered questionnaire and a paired-picture comparison interview. Description of the two instruments used as well as a discussion of the major findings are presented.en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
dc.subjectBoats and boating -- Environmental aspects -- Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)en_US
dc.subjectWater -- Pollution -- Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)en_US
dc.subjectColorado River (Colo.-Mexico) -- Recreational use -- Environmental aspects.en_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineRenewable Natural Resourcesen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
dc.identifier.proquest8017760en_US
dc.identifier.oclc6932484en_US
dc.identifier.bibrecord.b13201736en_US
All Items in UA Campus Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.