Persistent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/289159
Title:
A preliminary educational technology maturity model
Author:
Rintala, Gerald O.
Issue Date:
2000
Publisher:
The University of Arizona.
Rights:
Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
Abstract:
The current technological revolution has necessitated a new way to view the maturity of its computing environment within a given educational system. Adapting a model from the software industry which assesses the maturity of an organization, the researcher has developed an educational technology maturity model consisting of two dimensions: technology availability and teacher fluency with that technology. The purpose of the model is to locate a particular school within a given school district on a concept grid consisting of Technology Availability on an X-axis, and Teacher Fluency on the Y-axis. The continuum for each of the axes range from a Level 1 (the lowest) to a Level 5 (the highest). One of the uses of such a model is to give a school district a means to assess individual schools against a baseline within the district. This information can assist in the development of a technology plan if none exists, or to revise an existing plan to accomplish the goals of the district. Future uses may include relating technology assessment to achievement scores in schools or districts.
Type:
text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic)
Keywords:
Education, Technology of.
Degree Name:
Ph.D.
Degree Level:
doctoral
Degree Program:
Graduate College; Educational Psychology
Degree Grantor:
University of Arizona
Advisor:
Smith, Kenneth J.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleA preliminary educational technology maturity modelen_US
dc.creatorRintala, Gerald O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRintala, Gerald O.en_US
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe current technological revolution has necessitated a new way to view the maturity of its computing environment within a given educational system. Adapting a model from the software industry which assesses the maturity of an organization, the researcher has developed an educational technology maturity model consisting of two dimensions: technology availability and teacher fluency with that technology. The purpose of the model is to locate a particular school within a given school district on a concept grid consisting of Technology Availability on an X-axis, and Teacher Fluency on the Y-axis. The continuum for each of the axes range from a Level 1 (the lowest) to a Level 5 (the highest). One of the uses of such a model is to give a school district a means to assess individual schools against a baseline within the district. This information can assist in the development of a technology plan if none exists, or to revise an existing plan to accomplish the goals of the district. Future uses may include relating technology assessment to achievement scores in schools or districts.en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Technology of.en_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineEducational Psychologyen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Kenneth J.en_US
dc.identifier.proquest9983851en_US
dc.identifier.bibrecord.b40821857en_US
All Items in UA Campus Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.