Persistent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/227231
Title:
Diphthongization and Coindexing
Author:
Hayes, Bruce
Editors:
Crowhurst, Megan
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Publisher:
Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
Issue Date:
1988
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/227231
Abstract:
The tree model of segment structure proposed by Clements (1985) is an important innovation in phonological theory, making possible a number of interesting and arguably correct predictions about the form of assimilation rules, locality of rule application, and the organization of the distinctive feature system. Clements's proposal has given rise to an expanding literature, including Sagey (1986), Schein and Steriade (1986), Archangeli and Pulleyblank (forthcoming), and McCarthy (forthcoming). In this paper, I argue that the tree model as it stands faces a serious empirical shortcoming: it fails to provide an adequate account of diphthongization rules, here defined as rules that convert a segment (vowel or consonant) into a heterogeneous sequence. I propose a revised tree model, which for clarity and explicitness uses coindexation rather than association lines to indicate temporal association. I argue that my proposal solves the diphthongization problem, and that it also makes it possible to restrict the power of segment structure theory in the following way: the "feature- bearing units" (Clements 1980) for any feature are always elements of the prosodic tier, and not nodes in the segment tree.
Type:
Article
Language:
en_US
Keywords:
Grammar, comparative and general -- Phonology
Series/Report no.:
Arizona Phonology Conference Vol. 1; Coyote Papers; Coyote Papers 9

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Bruceen_US
dc.contributor.editorCrowhurst, Meganen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-01T18:25:09Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-01T18:25:09Z-
dc.date.issued1988-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/227231-
dc.description.abstractThe tree model of segment structure proposed by Clements (1985) is an important innovation in phonological theory, making possible a number of interesting and arguably correct predictions about the form of assimilation rules, locality of rule application, and the organization of the distinctive feature system. Clements's proposal has given rise to an expanding literature, including Sagey (1986), Schein and Steriade (1986), Archangeli and Pulleyblank (forthcoming), and McCarthy (forthcoming). In this paper, I argue that the tree model as it stands faces a serious empirical shortcoming: it fails to provide an adequate account of diphthongization rules, here defined as rules that convert a segment (vowel or consonant) into a heterogeneous sequence. I propose a revised tree model, which for clarity and explicitness uses coindexation rather than association lines to indicate temporal association. I argue that my proposal solves the diphthongization problem, and that it also makes it possible to restrict the power of segment structure theory in the following way: the "feature- bearing units" (Clements 1980) for any feature are always elements of the prosodic tier, and not nodes in the segment tree.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherDepartment of Linguistics, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesArizona Phonology Conference Vol. 1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCoyote Papersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCoyote Papers 9en_US
dc.subjectGrammar, comparative and general -- Phonologyen_US
dc.titleDiphthongization and Coindexingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of California, Los Angelesen_US
dc.identifier.oclc26728293-
All Items in UA Campus Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.