Persistent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/219811
Title:
Soil Amendment Demonstration on Cotton, Greenlee County
Author:
Tyler, Ray; DeRosa, Edith; Clark, Lee J.; Doerge, Tom; Stroehlein, Jack; Hansson, Bengt
Affiliation:
Department of Soils; University of Agriculture in Sweden; Boliden Corp.
Issue Date:
Mar-1986
Publisher:
College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
Journal:
Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report
Abstract:
Boligrow (an aluminum sulfate material from Sweden), gypsum and soil sulfur were evaluated as amendments on soil where differential water uptake had historically been a problem. A crop of cotton was grown and the yield of cotton was taken to determine if an economical change was effected by the amendments. Statistically there was no difference between treatments. A soil analysis indicated that sodium was not a problem in this soil, so texture was probably more related to the differential water uptake problem than was the chemical makeup of the soil.
Keywords:
Agriculture -- Arizona; Cotton -- Arizona; Cotton -- Fertility
Series/Report no.:
370063; Series P-63
Description:
The 1985 and 1986 Cotton Reports have the same publication and P-Series numbers.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.titleSoil Amendment Demonstration on Cotton, Greenlee Countyen_US
dc.contributor.authorTyler, Rayen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeRosa, Edithen_US
dc.contributor.authorClark, Lee J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDoerge, Tomen_US
dc.contributor.authorStroehlein, Jacken_US
dc.contributor.authorHansson, Bengten_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Soilsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Agriculture in Swedenen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBoliden Corp.en_US
dc.date.issued1986-03-
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.identifier.journalCotton: A College of Agriculture Reporten_US
dc.description.abstractBoligrow (an aluminum sulfate material from Sweden), gypsum and soil sulfur were evaluated as amendments on soil where differential water uptake had historically been a problem. A crop of cotton was grown and the yield of cotton was taken to determine if an economical change was effected by the amendments. Statistically there was no difference between treatments. A soil analysis indicated that sodium was not a problem in this soil, so texture was probably more related to the differential water uptake problem than was the chemical makeup of the soil.en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Fertilityen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/219811-
dc.relation.ispartofseries370063en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-63en_US
dc.descriptionThe 1985 and 1986 Cotton Reports have the same publication and P-Series numbers.en_US
All Items in UA Campus Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.