Persistent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/211317
Title:
Summary of Nitrogen Management Experiments in Irrigated Cotton
Author:
Silvertooth, J. C.; Norton, E. J.; Norton, E. R.
Issue Date:
2001
Publisher:
College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
Journal:
Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report
Abstract:
A series of nitrogen management experiments have been conducted over the past 11 years around the state to develop and refine fertilizer nitrogen (N) recommendations for irrigated desert cotton production. Stability analysis was used to summarize the data and to determine which of the four treatment regimes is most stable over a range of environments. Results indicate that the feedback treatment (treatment 3) was the most stable treatment for both Upland and Pima cottons and provided the best probability for a higher yield under high yielding environments. The untreated control treatment (treatment 1) was the least stable over a wide range of environments. These results further validate the ‘feedback’ approach to management of fertilizer N.
Keywords:
Agriculture -- Arizona; Cotton -- Arizona; Cotton -- Soil fertility; Cotton -- Soil management
Series/Report no.:
AZ1224; Series P-125

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.titleSummary of Nitrogen Management Experiments in Irrigated Cottonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSilvertooth, J. C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNorton, E. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNorton, E. R.en_US
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.identifier.journalCotton: A College of Agriculture Reporten_US
dc.description.abstractA series of nitrogen management experiments have been conducted over the past 11 years around the state to develop and refine fertilizer nitrogen (N) recommendations for irrigated desert cotton production. Stability analysis was used to summarize the data and to determine which of the four treatment regimes is most stable over a range of environments. Results indicate that the feedback treatment (treatment 3) was the most stable treatment for both Upland and Pima cottons and provided the best probability for a higher yield under high yielding environments. The untreated control treatment (treatment 1) was the least stable over a wide range of environments. These results further validate the ‘feedback’ approach to management of fertilizer N.en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Soil fertilityen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Soil managementen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/211317-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAZ1224en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-125en_US
All Items in UA Campus Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.