Persistent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/209635
Title:
Do Prowl and Treflan Cause Cotton Injury?
Author:
Moffett, Jody; McCloskey, William B.; Husman, Stephen H.; Dixon, Gary L.
Issue Date:
Mar-1994
Publisher:
College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
Journal:
Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report
Abstract:
Two dinitroaniline herbicides, Prowl and Treflan, were tested in field experiments with cotton to determine their differences, if any, in terms of weed control and crop injury potential. Plots treated with the lowest rate of Treflan (0.125 lb a.i./A at one location and 0.25 lb a.i./A at a second location) exhibited reduced weed control in comparison to the other herbicide treatments. Although root inhibition was slight, lateral root growth of cotton was inhibited more by the higher rates of Treflan (0.75 and 1.0 lb a.i./A) than by the higher rates of Prowl (1.0 and 1.25 lb a.i./A). However, differences in weed control and crop injury were not reflected in differences in cotton stand counts, height measurements and yield as there were no significant differences in these parameters between treatments.
Keywords:
Agriculture -- Arizona; Cotton -- Arizona; Cotton -- Weed control
Series/Report no.:
370096; Series P-96

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.titleDo Prowl and Treflan Cause Cotton Injury?en_US
dc.contributor.authorMoffett, Jodyen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcCloskey, William B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHusman, Stephen H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Gary L.en_US
dc.date.issued1994-03-
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.identifier.journalCotton: A College of Agriculture Reporten_US
dc.description.abstractTwo dinitroaniline herbicides, Prowl and Treflan, were tested in field experiments with cotton to determine their differences, if any, in terms of weed control and crop injury potential. Plots treated with the lowest rate of Treflan (0.125 lb a.i./A at one location and 0.25 lb a.i./A at a second location) exhibited reduced weed control in comparison to the other herbicide treatments. Although root inhibition was slight, lateral root growth of cotton was inhibited more by the higher rates of Treflan (0.75 and 1.0 lb a.i./A) than by the higher rates of Prowl (1.0 and 1.25 lb a.i./A). However, differences in weed control and crop injury were not reflected in differences in cotton stand counts, height measurements and yield as there were no significant differences in these parameters between treatments.en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Weed controlen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/209635-
dc.relation.ispartofseries370096en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-96en_US
All Items in UA Campus Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.