Persistent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/197458
Title:
Cotton Defoliation Evaluations, 1999
Author:
Silvertooth, J. C.; Norton, E. R.
Issue Date:
2000
Publisher:
College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
Journal:
Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report
Abstract:
Two field experiments were conducted near Marana and Coolidge, AZ in 1999 to evaluate the effectiveness of a number of defoliation treatments on Upland (var. DP 33b and AP 6101) cotton. All treatments consisted of materials commercially available in Arizona. Results reinforce general recommendations regarding the use of low rates (relative to the label ranges) under warm weather conditions and increasing rates as temperatures cool. Defoliation treatments of Ginstar alone did a satisfactory job of defoliation and regrowth/topgrowth contol and were very similar to treatments including Prep or Integrate. Adding Prep or Integrate to Ginstar in this experiment did not improve defoliation or topgrowth control.
Keywords:
Agriculture -- Arizona; Cotton -- Arizona; Crop management
Series/Report no.:
AZ1170

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.titleCotton Defoliation Evaluations, 1999en_US
dc.contributor.authorSilvertooth, J. C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNorton, E. R.en_US
dc.date.issued2000-
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.identifier.journalCotton: A College of Agriculture Reporten_US
dc.description.abstractTwo field experiments were conducted near Marana and Coolidge, AZ in 1999 to evaluate the effectiveness of a number of defoliation treatments on Upland (var. DP 33b and AP 6101) cotton. All treatments consisted of materials commercially available in Arizona. Results reinforce general recommendations regarding the use of low rates (relative to the label ranges) under warm weather conditions and increasing rates as temperatures cool. Defoliation treatments of Ginstar alone did a satisfactory job of defoliation and regrowth/topgrowth contol and were very similar to treatments including Prep or Integrate. Adding Prep or Integrate to Ginstar in this experiment did not improve defoliation or topgrowth control.en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCrop managementen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/197458-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAZ1170en_US
All Items in UA Campus Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.