Persistent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/186330
Title:
Evaluation of roadside revegetation in central Arizona.
Author:
Brooks, Margaret Ann.
Issue Date:
1993
Publisher:
The University of Arizona.
Rights:
Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
Abstract:
The policies of the USDA Forest Service and the Arizona Department of Transportation require revegetation of land disturbed by road construction. Revegetation objectives of both agencies include soil stabilization and mitigation of visual impacts. Typical seed mixes include Lehmann and Cochise lovegrass (Eragrostis Lehmanniana), crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum), desert buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens), and other species as appropriate. Seeding is done by drilling on slopes of 3:1 or flatter; hydroseeding is used on slopes steeper than 3:1. A mulch of blown-on straw, affixed with a vegetative tackifier, is typically applied after seeding. This study documented plant cover and density on roadside cuts and fills which were revegetated over a period of 7 years (1985-92). Plant cover and density were measured on cut and fill slopes and regressed against various independent environmental variables, including aspect, slope gradient, and soil particle size. The soil surface at each site was evaluated to assess success in soil stabilization. Success in mitigating visual impacts was evaluated by having university students rate the appearance of vegetation on each site. Results obtained in this study suggest that revegetation has been successful in meeting the stated objectives on fill sites, but not on cut sites.
Type:
text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic)
Keywords:
Dissertations, Academic.; Civil engineering.; Environmental sciences.
Degree Name:
Ph.D.
Degree Level:
doctoral
Degree Program:
Renewable Natural Resources; Graduate College
Degree Grantor:
University of Arizona
Committee Chair:
Wilkin, Donovan C.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of roadside revegetation in central Arizona.en_US
dc.creatorBrooks, Margaret Ann.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, Margaret Ann.en_US
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe policies of the USDA Forest Service and the Arizona Department of Transportation require revegetation of land disturbed by road construction. Revegetation objectives of both agencies include soil stabilization and mitigation of visual impacts. Typical seed mixes include Lehmann and Cochise lovegrass (Eragrostis Lehmanniana), crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum), desert buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens), and other species as appropriate. Seeding is done by drilling on slopes of 3:1 or flatter; hydroseeding is used on slopes steeper than 3:1. A mulch of blown-on straw, affixed with a vegetative tackifier, is typically applied after seeding. This study documented plant cover and density on roadside cuts and fills which were revegetated over a period of 7 years (1985-92). Plant cover and density were measured on cut and fill slopes and regressed against various independent environmental variables, including aspect, slope gradient, and soil particle size. The soil surface at each site was evaluated to assess success in soil stabilization. Success in mitigating visual impacts was evaluated by having university students rate the appearance of vegetation on each site. Results obtained in this study suggest that revegetation has been successful in meeting the stated objectives on fill sites, but not on cut sites.en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
dc.subjectDissertations, Academic.en_US
dc.subjectCivil engineering.en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental sciences.en_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineRenewable Natural Resourcesen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
dc.contributor.chairWilkin, Donovan C.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMcPherson, Guy R.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRoundy, Bruce A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSaarinen, Thomas F.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSell, James L.en_US
dc.identifier.proquest9333334en_US
dc.identifier.oclc720044771en_US
All Items in UA Campus Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.