Changing patterns of investment in the world aluminum industry under free trade.

Persistent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/186150
Title:
Changing patterns of investment in the world aluminum industry under free trade.
Author:
Masbruch, Thomas Allen.
Issue Date:
1993
Publisher:
The University of Arizona.
Rights:
Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
Abstract:
This dynamic study of investment under uncertainty reveals that conventional analyses of aluminum industry patterns of trade and investment may be based on industrial policy rather than competitive advantages. The study results confirm the hypothesis that, with competition and free trade, U.S. aluminum smelting investment (and capacity) does not decrease, rather it increases as capacity is lost by Pacific Basin (PB) and European (EUR) suppliers, both presently protected with high tariffs. Using a competitive market approach and rational expectations, firms are considered as taking current market prices and acting as if current output and investment decisions will not affect current or future prices. Fixed production proportions of input to output are assumed for all production stages, for efficient-sized plants. Dynamic elements are captured through frictions in adjustment of smelting capacity that restrict the capacity that can be added in a single period. Investment is irreversible except by depreciation. In the resultant expectations framework, supply and demand are not always in sync and random shifts in investment occur across different regions. Rational expectations allows equivalence between a competitive equilibrium and welfare optimization under uncertainty. The study here solves the simpler but equivalent welfare maximization problem. The pattern of investment under free trade shows that, though the Latin American (LA) and (PB) smelting regions have absolute advantages in smelter power costs (typically assumed the determining factor for new investment), total aluminum production costs (including bauxite and alumina) in the eastern U.S. and western North America (US-E and NA-W) are sufficiently below those of (EUR) and PB to maintain the former's competitive advantages. Using World Bank aluminum demand growth rates, US-E capacity increases by 28 percent and NA-W by 49 percent as EUR capacity falls by 22 percent and PB by 32 percent for the year 2010. The results differ markedly from conventional forecasts which have predicted declines in North American investment, inferring that barriers to free trade may be distorting investment patterns.
Type:
text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic)
Keywords:
Dissertations, Academic.; Finance.; Mining engineering.
Degree Name:
Ph.D.
Degree Level:
doctoral
Degree Program:
Mining and Geological Engineering; Graduate College
Degree Grantor:
University of Arizona
Committee Chair:
Newcomb, Richard T.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleChanging patterns of investment in the world aluminum industry under free trade.en_US
dc.creatorMasbruch, Thomas Allen.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMasbruch, Thomas Allen.en_US
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis dynamic study of investment under uncertainty reveals that conventional analyses of aluminum industry patterns of trade and investment may be based on industrial policy rather than competitive advantages. The study results confirm the hypothesis that, with competition and free trade, U.S. aluminum smelting investment (and capacity) does not decrease, rather it increases as capacity is lost by Pacific Basin (PB) and European (EUR) suppliers, both presently protected with high tariffs. Using a competitive market approach and rational expectations, firms are considered as taking current market prices and acting as if current output and investment decisions will not affect current or future prices. Fixed production proportions of input to output are assumed for all production stages, for efficient-sized plants. Dynamic elements are captured through frictions in adjustment of smelting capacity that restrict the capacity that can be added in a single period. Investment is irreversible except by depreciation. In the resultant expectations framework, supply and demand are not always in sync and random shifts in investment occur across different regions. Rational expectations allows equivalence between a competitive equilibrium and welfare optimization under uncertainty. The study here solves the simpler but equivalent welfare maximization problem. The pattern of investment under free trade shows that, though the Latin American (LA) and (PB) smelting regions have absolute advantages in smelter power costs (typically assumed the determining factor for new investment), total aluminum production costs (including bauxite and alumina) in the eastern U.S. and western North America (US-E and NA-W) are sufficiently below those of (EUR) and PB to maintain the former's competitive advantages. Using World Bank aluminum demand growth rates, US-E capacity increases by 28 percent and NA-W by 49 percent as EUR capacity falls by 22 percent and PB by 32 percent for the year 2010. The results differ markedly from conventional forecasts which have predicted declines in North American investment, inferring that barriers to free trade may be distorting investment patterns.en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
dc.subjectDissertations, Academic.en_US
dc.subjectFinance.en_US
dc.subjectMining engineering.en_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineMining and Geological Engineeringen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
dc.contributor.chairNewcomb, Richard T.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberHarris, DeVerle P.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRieber, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberReynolds, Stanley S.en_US
dc.identifier.proquest9322650en_US
dc.identifier.oclc714885912en_US
All Items in UA Campus Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.