Persistent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105891
Title:
The Criteria for Open Access
Author:
Goodman, David
Citation:
The Criteria for Open Access 2004-11, 30(4):258-270 Serials Review
Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Serials Review
Issue Date:
Nov-2004
Description:
Special Issue: Open Access 2004, doi:10l1016/j.serrev.2004.09.009
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105891
Submitted date:
2005-04-01
Abstract:
Each proposal for Open Access (OA) has its unique combination of features; each argument for or against OA focuses on particular features or criteria. This article is intended to discuss these criteria, both individually and also as each of them contributes to the different proposals for OA. Evaluation of the proposals themselves is not attempted. This discussion is intended to be of value to the supporters of OA, in choosing which plan to adopt, and to those opposed to OA, in showing where the weaknesses do and do not lie. In other words, this article intends to improve the level of factual understanding in the ongoing discussions.
Type:
Journal Article (Paginated)
Language:
en
Keywords:
Scholarly Communication; Electronic Publishing
Local subject classification:
Open Access

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-04-01T00:00:01Z-
dc.date.available2010-06-18T23:36:16Z-
dc.date.issued2004-11en_US
dc.date.submitted2005-04-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Criteria for Open Access 2004-11, 30(4):258-270 Serials Reviewen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/105891-
dc.descriptionSpecial Issue: Open Access 2004, doi:10l1016/j.serrev.2004.09.009en_US
dc.description.abstractEach proposal for Open Access (OA) has its unique combination of features; each argument for or against OA focuses on particular features or criteria. This article is intended to discuss these criteria, both individually and also as each of them contributes to the different proposals for OA. Evaluation of the proposals themselves is not attempted. This discussion is intended to be of value to the supporters of OA, in choosing which plan to adopt, and to those opposed to OA, in showing where the weaknesses do and do not lie. In other words, this article intends to improve the level of factual understanding in the ongoing discussions.en_US
dc.format.mimetypedocen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectScholarly Communicationen_US
dc.subjectElectronic Publishingen_US
dc.subject.otherOpen Accessen_US
dc.titleThe Criteria for Open Accessen_US
dc.typeJournal Article (Paginated)en_US
dc.identifier.journalSerials Reviewen_US
All Items in UA Campus Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.