Persistent Link:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105465
Title:
Identifying Open Access Articles: Valid and Invalid Methods
Author:
Goodman, David; Antelman, Kristin; Bakkalbasi, Nisa
Citation:
Identifying Open Access Articles: Valid and Invalid Methods 2005,
Issue Date:
2005
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105465
Submitted date:
2005-12-03
Abstract:
Many versions of an article are now visible on the web, including not only open access (OA), but also paid access, preliminary versions, abstracts, and mere references or citations. The purpose of OA requires not only that the article can be read without the barrier of payment, but also that the reader can find the article to be read without the barrier of extensive searching. We will demonstrate the dubious validity of one prominent system for identifying OA and measuring the amount of OA and the OA Advantage. We will then briefly discuss the remaining alternatives.
Type:
Conference Paper
Language:
en
Keywords:
Scholarly Communication
Local subject classification:
Open Access; Open Access Advantage

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorAntelman, Kristinen_US
dc.contributor.authorBakkalbasi, Nisaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-12-03T00:00:01Z-
dc.date.available2010-06-18T23:26:00Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.date.submitted2005-12-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationIdentifying Open Access Articles: Valid and Invalid Methods 2005,en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/105465-
dc.description.abstractMany versions of an article are now visible on the web, including not only open access (OA), but also paid access, preliminary versions, abstracts, and mere references or citations. The purpose of OA requires not only that the article can be read without the barrier of payment, but also that the reader can find the article to be read without the barrier of extensive searching. We will demonstrate the dubious validity of one prominent system for identifying OA and measuring the amount of OA and the OA Advantage. We will then briefly discuss the remaining alternatives.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectScholarly Communicationen_US
dc.subject.otherOpen Accessen_US
dc.subject.otherOpen Access Advantageen_US
dc.titleIdentifying Open Access Articles: Valid and Invalid Methodsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
All Items in UA Campus Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.